United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-14256

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:02-cr-00073-LSC-GMB-23 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLARENCE GENE SHANKLIN, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(May 12, 2021) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 2 of 2

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr., in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shanklin’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished