United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.
United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-14256
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:02-cr-00073-LSC-GMB-23 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CLARENCE GENE SHANKLIN, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(May 12, 2021) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 2 of 2
W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr., in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shanklin’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished