U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2021

United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.

United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 12, 2021

United States v. Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-14256 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:02-cr-00073-LSC-GMB-23

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

CLARENCE GENE SHANKLIN, SR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (May 12, 2021) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-14256 Date Filed: 05/12/2021 Page: 2 of 2

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr., in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shanklin’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.