United States v. Ulises Alonso Pineda-Soriano
United States v. Ulises Alonso Pineda-Soriano
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-13010 Date Filed: 05/25/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-13010 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cr-00127-RAL-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ULISES PINEDA-SORIANO, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (May 25, 2021) Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-13010 Date Filed: 05/25/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Ulises Pineda-Soriano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pineda-Soriano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.