United States v. Michael Lewis Pitts
United States v. Michael Lewis Pitts
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 19-15188 Date Filed: 06/11/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-15188 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:19-cr-00012-LGW-CLR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL LEWIS PITTS, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (June 11, 2021) USCA11 Case: 19-15188 Date Filed: 06/11/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Before WILSON, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Paul Mooney, appointed counsel for Michael Lewis Pitts, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pitts’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED. Pitts’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.