United States v. Corye Daniels
United States v. Corye Daniels
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-10216 Date Filed: 06/14/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 21-10216
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cr-00035-MHH-SGC-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CORYE DANIELS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(June 14, 2021) Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 21-10216 Date Filed: 06/14/2021 Page: 2 of 2
W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Corye Daniels in his appeal of the revocation of his supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Daniels’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished