United States v. Brian James Hulse
United States v. Brian James Hulse
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 21-10359 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
BRIAN HULSE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (August 2, 2021) Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this revocation of supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.