United States v. Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-13062

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00609-VMC-CPT-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SILVIO SEGUNDO MICOLTA-SINISTERRA, a.k.a. Silvio Luna,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 5, 2021)

USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 2 of 2 Before NEWSOM, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Micolta-Sinisterra’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished