United States v. Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra
United States v. Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-13062 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00609-VMC-CPT-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SILVIO SEGUNDO MICOLTA-SINISTERRA, a.k.a. Silvio Luna,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (August 5, 2021) USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Before NEWSOM, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Micolta-Sinisterra’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.