United States v. Sean-Michael Smith
United States v. Sean-Michael Smith
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-10071 Date Filed: 08/18/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 21-10071 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00153-MMH-PDB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
SEAN-MICHAEL SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (August 18, 2021) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 21-10071 Date Filed: 08/18/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for Sean-Michael Smith in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following the revocation of Smith’s supervised release. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.