United States v. Kendell Jamal Cushon
United States v. Kendell Jamal Cushon
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-11716 Date Filed: 09/16/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 21-11716
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00037-LC-8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus KENDELL JAMAL CUSHON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 16, 2021) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 21-11716 Date Filed: 09/16/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Megan Saillant, appointed counsel for Kendell Cushon in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following the revocation of Cushon’s supervised release. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cushon’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished