United States v. Michael Prime
United States v. Michael Prime
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-12498 Date Filed: 09/30/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-12498
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00540-JSM-AAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MICHAEL PRIME,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 30, 2021) Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-12498 Date Filed: 09/30/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Michael Prime in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prime’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished