United States v. Michael Prime

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Michael Prime

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-12498 Date Filed: 09/30/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-12498

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00540-JSM-AAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL PRIME,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 30, 2021) Before JORDAN, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-12498 Date Filed: 09/30/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Michael Prime in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prime’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished