United States v. Damien Madison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Damien Madison

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-11626 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11626 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAMIEN MADISON, a.k.a. Pit, a.k.a. Slick, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00145-TWT-JKL-36 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11626 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11626

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David Jones, appointed counsel for Damien Madison in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Madison’s motion for appointment of new coun- sel is DENIED as moot.

Reference

Status
Unpublished