United States v. Wilson Peter Revange
United States v. Wilson Peter Revange
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-13249 Date Filed: 12/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-13249 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON PETER REVANGE, a.k.a. Jackboi, a.k.a. Winson Revange,
Defendant-Appellant. USCA11 Case: 20-13249 Date Filed: 12/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-13249
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00327-SCB-AEP-10 ____________________
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: William Sansone, appointed counsel for Wilson Revange in this appeal from the denial of Revange’s post-judgment motion for a certified copy of his criminal-proceeding documents and subse- quent motion for reconsideration, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Revange’s post-judgment motions seeking documents are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished