United States v. Killian Francis
United States v. Killian Francis
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-11496 Date Filed: 12/23/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-11496 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KILLIAN FRANCIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:20-cr-60122-RAR-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11496 Date Filed: 12/23/2021 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11496
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, LUCK and LAGOA, Cir- cuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Killian Francis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Francis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished