United States v. Steven J. McLendon
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-11704 Date Filed: 01/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 21-11704
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
STEVEN J. MCLENDON,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00048-TKW-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11704 Date Filed: 01/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11704
Before WILSON, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Hendrix, appointed counsel for Steven McLendon in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McLendon’s conviction and sen- tence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.