United States v. McKendrick Arnez Harris

USCA11 Case: 21-10315 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 21-10315

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MCKENDRICK ARNEZ HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00480-LCB-HNJ-5 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-10315 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-10315

Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for McKendrick Arnez Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with- draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our inde- pendent review of the record reveals that Bradford’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convic- tion and sentence are AFFIRMED.