United States v. Antonio Turrentine

USCA11 Case: 21-11050 Date Filed: 03/14/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 21-11050

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ANTONIO TURRENTINE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00087-JPB-CCB-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11050 Date Filed: 03/14/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11050

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sydney Strickland, appointed counsel for Antonio Turren- tine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur- ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Turrentine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.