United States v. Frank H. Bynes, Jr.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-10673 Date Filed: 03/30/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 20-10673
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
FRANK H. BYNES, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00153-LGW-CLR-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 20-10673 Date Filed: 03/30/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-10673
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George Asinc, appointed counsel for Frank Bynes, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to An- ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the rela- tive merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina- tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, coun- sel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bynes’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.