United States v. Freddy Paul Foreman, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Freddy Paul Foreman, Jr.

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-12778 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-12778 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDDY PAUL FOREMAN, JR., a.k.a. Buckshot,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-CG-B-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-12778 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-12778

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas B. Walsh, appointed counsel for Freddy Foreman, Jr., in his appeal of the revocation of his supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Foreman’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished