United States v. Danial Cronkite

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Danial Cronkite

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-12032 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIAL CRONKITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00288-JSM-MAP-8 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11837

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Danial Cronkite in this appeal of a sentence following revocation of supervised re- lease, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor- rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cronkite’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished