United States v. Danial Cronkite
United States v. Danial Cronkite
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-12032 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIAL CRONKITE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00288-JSM-MAP-8 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11837
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Danial Cronkite in this appeal of a sentence following revocation of supervised re- lease, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor- rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cronkite’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished