United States v. Lori Ann Crofoot
United States v. Lori Ann Crofoot
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13876 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORI ANN CROFOOT,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00243-KKM-CPT-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-13876
Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Michelle R. Yard, appointed counsel for Lori Ann Crofoot in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur- ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent re- view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent ex- amination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crofoot’s con- viction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.