United States v. Lori Ann Crofoot

USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 21-13876

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

LORI ANN CROFOOT,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00243-KKM-CPT-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-13876

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michelle R. Yard, appointed counsel for Lori Ann Crofoot in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur- ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent re- view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent ex- amination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crofoot’s con- viction and sentence are AFFIRMED.