Jodi Jacobs v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company

USCA11 Case: 21-13405 Date Filed: 05/31/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-13405 Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JODI JACOBS, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Barry Jacobs,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, A foreign corporation,

Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-61017-RKA

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13405 Date Filed: 05/31/2022 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 21-13405 Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mrs. Jodi Jacobs appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Mid-Continent Casu- alty Company (MCC). The district court found that Jacobs “failed to meet her burden of apportioning her damages between the two state-court defendants.”

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judg- ment considering the facts and drawing all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Mann v. Taser Int’l, Inc., 588 F.3d 1291, 1303 (11th Cir. 2009).

Under Florida law, a plaintiff who settles with an insured de- fendant and then sues the defendant’s insurer for indemnification, bears the burden of establishing the allocation of the total damages as between the covered and uncovered claims. Keller Indus., Inc. v. Emps. Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 429 So. 2d 779, 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983) (collecting cases). If the insured fails to allocate its losses, it is precluded from recovering against the insurer. Id. Mrs. Jacobs failed to produce any evidence that the settled claims at issue were allocated as required under Florida law. As a result, MCC is enti- tled to summary judgment. We affirm.

AFFIRMED.