United States v. Mikel Wayne Nunnally

USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 21-13722

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MIKEL WAYNE NUNNALLY,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00007-PGB-GJK-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-13722

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Mikel Nunnally in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nunnally’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.