United States v. Mikel Wayne Nunnally

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Mikel Wayne Nunnally

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-13722 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIKEL WAYNE NUNNALLY,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00007-PGB-GJK-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-13722

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Mikel Nunnally in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nunnally’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished