United States v. Jamie Joseph Manz
United States v. Jamie Joseph Manz
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-10470 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10470 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMIE JOSEPH MANZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00477-WFJ-SPF-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10470 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 2 of 2
22-10470 Opinion of the Court 2
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jenny Devine, appointed counsel for Jamie Manz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Manz’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished