USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-10297 ____________________

MOMS FOR LIBERTY - BREVARD COUNTY, FL, AMY KNEESSY, ASHLEY HALL, KATIE DELANEY, JOSEPH CHOLEWA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MISTY HAGGARD-BELFORD, Chair, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, MATT SUSIN, Vice Chair, Brevard County School Board, in his official and individual capacities, USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10297

CHERYL MCDOUGALL, Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, KATYE CAMPBELL, Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01849-RBD-GJK ____________________

Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and RUIZ, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs-Appellants Moms for Liberty–Brevard County, FL and four of its members challenged as unconstitutional the Public Participation Policy utilized by Defendants-Appellees Brevard Pub- lic Schools and the individual members of its school board.

* Honorable Rodolfo A. Ruiz II, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation. USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 3 of 3

22-10297 Opinion of the Court 3

Appellants filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which the dis- trict court denied. See Moms for Liberty–Brevard Cnty., FL v. Bre- vard Pub. Schs., 582 F. Supp. 3d 1214, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2022). Ap- pellants timely appealed. After review of the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s thorough, well-reasoned order. See Schultz v. Alabama, 42 F.4th 1298, 1311 (11th Cir. 2022) (“We review a district court’s order granting or denying a preliminary injunction for abuse of discre- tion.”). We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Ap- pellants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. AFFIRMED.