United States v. Keshonn Brown
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-10624 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-10624
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
KESHONN BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-00001-JRH-BKE-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10624 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 12/05/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10624
Before JORDAN, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Clark, appointed counsel for Keshonn Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.