United States v. Seth Kelly Gifford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Seth Kelly Gifford

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 22-11497 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 12/14/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11497 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SETH KELLY GIFFORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00024-KKM-SPF-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11497 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 12/14/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11497

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Seth Kelly Gifford in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gifford’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished