United States v. Clarence Brenson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Clarence Brenson

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11680 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLARENCE BRENSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00203-JB-B-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11680

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Clarence Brenson in his appeal from the revocation of his supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s as- sessment of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina- tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, coun- sel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brenson’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished