United States v. Brandon Leross Bailey

USCA11 Case: 22-11277 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 22-11277

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

BRANDON LEROSS BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00171-CG-B-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11277 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11277

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Hickman, appointed counsel for Brandon Bailey in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bailey’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.