United States v. James Gordon Hill
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-12296 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 21-12296
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
JAMES GORDON HILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:07-cr-00275-TJC-MCR-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-12296 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-12296
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for James Gordon Hill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to An- ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hill’s supervised release revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.