United States v. Thomas James Harris
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-11517 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/23/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-11517
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
THOMAS JAMES HARRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00151-RBD-DCI-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11517 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/23/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11517
Before WILSON, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Collins, appointed counsel for Thomas James Har- ris in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur- ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.