United States v. Jimmy Lee Highsmith

USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 22-10901

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:21-cr-00008-MW-MAF-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10901

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and WILSON and LUCK, Cir- cuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Jimmy Lee High- smith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo- tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Highsmith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.