United States v. Philip Fisher
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-11502
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
PHILIP FISHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00251-PGB-LHP-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Order of the Court 22-11502
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEWSOM and GRANT, Cir- cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Philip Fisher in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fisher’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.