United States v. Philip Fisher
United States v. Philip Fisher
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11502 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILIP FISHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00251-PGB-LHP-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Order of the Court 22-11502
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEWSOM and GRANT, Cir- cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Philip Fisher in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en- tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fisher’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.