United States v. Johnny Lee Crooker
United States v. Johnny Lee Crooker
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-12702 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/28/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12702 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHNNY LEE CROOKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00276-TFM-B-6 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-12702 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/28/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12702
Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Arthur J. Madden, III, appointed counsel for Johnny Lee Crooker in this appeal of Crooker’s revocation of supervised re- lease, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Crooker and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor- rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crooker’s revocation and sentence upon revoca- tion are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.