Susan Drazen v. Mr. Juan Enrique Pinto
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hylton v. Titlemax of Virginia, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 2023)
- Susan Drazen v. Mr. Juan Enrique Pinto (11th Cir. 2024)
- CURRIE v. JOY CONE CO. (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2024)
- Susan Drazen v. Juan Pinto (11th Cir. 2024)
- Stephen Muccio v. Global Motivation, Inc. (11th Cir. 2023)
- Read v. Coty DTC Holdings, LLC (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2023)
- Simpson v. The J.G. Wentworth Company (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2023)
- Orenstein v. Spruce Services, Inc. (District Court, W.D. Texas 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 21-10199 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 03/13/2023 Page: 1 of 2
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 21-10199 ____________________
SUSAN DRAZEN, on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Godaddy.com, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Defendant-Appellee, versus
MR. JUAN ENRIQUE PINTO,
Movant-Appellant. USCA11 Case: 21-10199 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 03/13/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Order of the Court 21-10199 ____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-00563-KD-B ____________________
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a ma- jority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this ap- peal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.