United States v. Candice Nyeisha Adams
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-12310 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/29/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-12310
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
CANDICE NYEISHA ADAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:21-cr-60325-RNS-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-12310 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/29/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12310
Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Philip Horowitz, appointed counsel for Candice Adams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.