United States v. Anthony J. Klatch, II
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-12925 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 04/03/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-12925
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ANTHONY J. KLATCH, II,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00135-JDW-JSS-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-12925 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 04/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12925
Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Vanessa L. King, appointed counsel for Anthony J. Klatch, II, has moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent exami- nation of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Klatch’s correspondence construed as a mo- tion to compel the filing of a Rule 35 motion based on substantial assistance is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.