United States v. Benjamin Eugene Walter
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-10753 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-10753
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
BENJAMIN EUGENE WALTER,
Defendant- Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00073-AKK-GMB-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10753 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10753
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Perry Russel Steen, appointed counsel for Benjamin Eugene Walter in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walter’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.