United States v. Marvin Harris, Jr.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-11068 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 04/14/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-11068
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
MARVIN HARRIS, JR., a.k.a. Mesh, a.k.a. Marvin Harris,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida USCA11 Case: 22-11068 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 04/14/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11068 D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cr-00134-SPC-MRM-1 ____________________
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Keith W. Upson, appointed counsel for Marvin Harris, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.