United States v. Wayne Lee Johnson
United States v. Wayne Lee Johnson
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-12253 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 05/10/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12253 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WAYNE LEE JOHNSON, a.k.a. Wayne Johnson,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00242-WFJ-AEP-1 USCA11 Case: 22-12253 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 05/10/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12253 ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Laura Daines, appointed counsel for Wayne Lee Johnson, has moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson filed a re- sponse to his counsel’s motion, requesting the appointment of new appellate counsel. Our independent review of the entire record re- veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re- veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Johnson’s motion to appoint new coun- sel is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.