United States v. Deri Hobbs

USCA11 Case: 22-13377 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________

No. 22-13377

Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

DERI HOBBS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00254-JB-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-13377 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 22-13377

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Deri Hobbs in this ap- peal following the revocation of Hobbs’s supervised release and re- sentencing in 2022, has moved to withdraw from further represen- tation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor- nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec- ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Hobbs’s supervised release and the imposition of a new sentence of 60 months of im- prisonment are AFFIRMED.