USCA11 Case: 23-11077 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11077 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ EFN WEST PALM MOTOR SALES, LLC, d.b.a. Napleton's West Palm Beach Hyundai, NORTH PALM HYUNDAI, LLC, d.b.a. Napleton's North Palm Hyundai, Plaintiffs-Appellants, FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, Plaintiff, versus HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, USCA11 Case: 23-11077 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11077 Defendant-Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 9:21-cv-80348-AMC ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Upon review of the record and the parties’ joint response to the jurisdictional questions, the parties’ motion to supplement the record about the plaintiffs’ citizenship, incorporated in their re- sponse, is GRANTED. We accept the declaration submitted with the motion to supplement and deem the record so supplemented.

See Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co., 883 F.2d 1553, 1555 (11th Cir. 1989). The record as supplemented now establishes that there was complete diversity of citizenship and the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over this action in the first instance; specifically, the plaintiff limited liability companies, through their members, are citizens of Florida and Illinois, while the defendant corporation is a citizen of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Travaglio v. Am. Ex- press Co., 735 F.3d 1266, 1269 (11th Cir. 2013); Mallory & Evans Con- tractors & Eng’rs, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ., 663 F.3d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir. 2011); Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., USCA11 Case: 23-11077 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 3 of 3

23-11077 Opinion of the Court 3 374 F.3d 1020, 1021 (11th Cir. 2004); Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc v. Mur- phy, 924 F.3d 1134, 1143 (11th Cir. 2019).

Accordingly, this appeal MAY PROCEED.