United States v. Michael Williams
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-13516 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 20-13516
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
MICHAEL WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 4:19-cr-00089-LGW-CLR-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 20-13516 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-13516
Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis A. O’Brien, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Wil- liams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.