United States v. Klonde Hatter
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-10781 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-10781
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
KLONDE DELVIUM HATTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00466-ACA-JHE-7 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10781 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 2 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10781
____________________
No. 22-10784
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
KLONDE DELVIUM HATTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00131-ACA-JHE-2 ____________________
Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for Klonde Hatter, in these consolidated direct criminal appeals, has moved to with- draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief USCA11 Case: 22-10781 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 3 of 3
22-10781 Opinion of the Court 3 pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ- ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examinations of both of the entire records reveal no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hat- ter’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.