United States v. Cody Dillon Hogan
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-13887 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 10/05/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 22-13887
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
CODY DILLON HOGAN, a.k.a. Stonetelephone,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00143-BJD-MCR-1 USCA11 Case: 22-13887 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 10/05/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13887 ____________________
Before GRANT, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jenny Devine, appointed counsel for Cody Hogan in this di- rect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal- ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hogan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Hogan’s motion to withdraw his prior motions and supplement his brief is GRANTED, and his motions to supplement his brief are DENIED AS MOOT.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.