United States v. Andrew Bravo Jimenez
United States v. Andrew Bravo Jimenez
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11379 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW BRAVO JIMENEZ, a.k.a. DROOPY,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00045-CAR-CHW-4 USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11379 ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: John Jay McArthur, appointed counsel for Andrew Bravo-Jimenez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with- draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ- ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jimenez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.