Pamela A. Ajoloko v. Jamas Technology
Pamela A. Ajoloko v. Jamas Technology
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-11854 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 07/15/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11854 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ PAMELA A. AJOLOKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JAMAS TECHNOLOGY,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 7:23-cv-00177-LSC ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11854 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 07/15/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11854
Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Pamela Ajoloko appeals the district court’s final order grant- ing the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which it en- tered on April 25, 2024 along with a memorandum opinion. Ajo- loko was required to file a notice of appeal on or before May 28, 2024, but she did not file her notice of appeal until June 5, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 7(A)(ii). Thus, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate juris- diction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot entertain an appeal that is out of time).
The appellee’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the tim- ing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other appli- cable rules.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.