Statesman Garden, LP v. Sereta Blackman
Statesman Garden, LP v. Sereta Blackman
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-12076 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 08/07/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-12076 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ STATESMAN GARDEN, LP, a.k.a. The Statesman, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SERETA BLACKMAN, and All Other Occupants,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 24-12076 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 08/07/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12076 D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-00124-RWS ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Sereta Blackman, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding to state court a dispossessory action. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.