United States v. Garner Howard Chestang
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-10346 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 08/19/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________
No. 24-10346
Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
GARNER HOWARD CHESTANG, a.k.a. Howard Chestang,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00211-TFM-N-1 USCA11 Case: 24-10346 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 08/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-10346 ____________________
Before BRASHER, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Domingo Soto, counsel for Garner Howard Chestang in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal- ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Chestang’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.