USCA11 Case: 24-11923 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11923 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ROY STEWART MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TIANA LOWE, JERRY DUNLEAVY, TIMOTHY CARNEY, PHILLIP KLEIN, BRAD POLUMBO, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11923 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11923 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cv-00124-CLM ____________________ Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: The appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of juris- diction is GRANTED, appellant’s motion to suspend the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Roy Moore’s June 12, 2024 notice of appeal is un- timely to appeal from the district court’s April 3, 2024 final judg- ment. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a). Furthermore, we cannot allow the appeal to proceed under an equitable excep- tion to the timeliness requirement because that requirement is ju- risdictional. See Green, 606 F.3d at 1300; Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 215 (2007). Nor can we suspend the appellate deadline in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) under Fed. R. App. P. 2 because suspension of that Rule is explicitly prohibited. See Fed. R. App. P. 2(a), 26(b).